Company Law Study Group – Chair's Report
Chairman: Louis Manson
The Company Law Review Steering Group
has prepared its final report and submitted it to the DTI for
consideration before publication. Any legislation will not be ready for at
least a year.
This Study Group has made submissions on
all the consultation documents published and has focused on those elements
with a political context, i.e. the form of Company Law, dealing with what
it is meant to achieve, corporate governance and SMEs. When the final
report is published, we expect to submit a response on these and related
matters.
Emerging Markets Study Group –
Chair's Report
Chairman: Sir Peter Heap KCMG
The Group held eight meetings between
30th May 2000 and 21st June 2001. Although the active membership of the
Group is not large, this is made up for by the enthusiasm and loyalty of
the 10 or so members who attend regularly. The meetings are mostly held in
committee rooms at the House of Commons and sometimes at the home of the
Group's Chairman.
In the first part of this period
discussions focused on the preparation and publication of a study paper on
Trade and economic Relations with Southern Africa drafted by Deva
Ponnoosami. This was finalised in September 2000 and in the following
weeks it was widely circulated. Ministerial recipients included Richard
Caborn, Peter Hain and Clare Short. A request for a meeting with the DTI's
Richard Caborn to discuss it did not get a response, but a copy was given
to the Financial Secretary, Stephen Timms, shortly before his visit to
South Africa, who subsequently told the Group that he had found it
valuable.
In early 2001 the Group's Chairman had a
meeting with the Chairman of LFIG's China Study Group, Stephen Parry, with
a view to co-ordinating the work of the two Groups. This will be kept
under review, but meanwhile the China Group's study, A Third Way with
Chinese Characteristics, was circulated within the Emerging Markets
Group. Meetings then discussed further likely topics for a further formal
study. A different format was followed on 8th May when a well attended
meeting heard an excellent talk by Diana Weinhold of the London School of
Economics on the pros and cons of debt relief.
SME Study Group – Chair's Report
Chairman: Professor John Stanworth
The LFIG SME Study Group has become
active again over the last year under the Chairmanship of Professor John
Stanworth. John is Professor of Enterprise Studies at the Westminster
Business School (University of Westminster) and also Director-General of
the Small Business Research Trust (based at the Open University Business
School). Activities during the last year included:
 |
A joint meeting between the Council of
the Small Business Research Trust and LFIG SME Study Group members at the
University of Westminster to listen to a talk on Business Angels by
Professor Colin Mason and discuss possible strategy options (University of
Southampton). |
 |
Meetings at the House of Commons to
discuss future strategy plus our role in the General Election campaign. |
 |
A link-up between LFIG SME and Roger
Sharp (Head of Business Liaison at Millbank Tower) prior to, and during,
the election period in a strategy to defend the Government from press
claims that SMEs were being 'strangled' by Government red tape. This
involved press releases plus LFIG members being on standby during the
election to refute, if necessary, claims against the Government. |
 |
John Pickering and John Stanworth
meeting with Patricia Hewitt (Minister for Small Business and E-Commerce),
Lord Chris Haskins (Chairman of the Better Regulation Taskforce) and
others to discuss Government policies on SMEs and the issue of red tape. |
 |
A Meeting with DTI representatives
(seconded from the Bank of England) to discuss Government proposals on
Business Angels. |
With the election now out of the way, it
is hoped that the LFIG SME Study Group can build upon its strength to once
again become the force it has been at times in the past. A proposal which
has much to commend it might by that the group, focusing on key issues,
should operate in Parliamentary Select Committee mode. We are, after all,
ideally suited at the House of Commons to call in and receive expert
witness contributions feeding into areas of specialist interest.
China Study Group – Chair's Report
Chairman: Stephen Perry
The China Study Group put together a
report on china, starting with trade but never received an acknowledgement
of it and, therefore, we have done nothing further. I do not presume that
the people who put it together would think there is much point in doing
any more work if the first study went nowhere.
Transport Study Group – Chair's Report
Chairman: Hugh Collis
The Group did not meet during the last
half of 2000, and the Chair resigned, concerned that the concerns of the
group were not being acknowledged by Labour ministers. Particular concerns
of the group had been opposition to the privatisation of National Air
Traffic Services (NATS) and the proposals for a Public Private Partnership
(PPP) for London Underground. I was asked to take the chair and we have
had two meetings before suspending activities for the general election.
Whilst the group had not changed its
views on NATS and the Underground PPP, it was agreed that further work on
these was not particularly useful, and the NATS issue has been resolved
satisfactorily with a transfer to the Airlines group. Two main concerns
for the new government, which the group wishes to start work on shortly
are the future of Railtrack and the airport capacity in the South East. I
met John Biggs, the Labour Transport Spokesman on the Greater London
Authority, and he has been asked to speak to the group about Labour
transport policy in London.
I have written to Stephen Byers and John
Spellar congratulating them on their appointments as Secretary of State
and Minister responsible for transport and asked them if they would be
prepared to meet the group or its representatives.
Utility Study Group – Chair's
Report
Chairman: John Pickering
The Utility Group's activity this year
consisted of hosting a visit to the UK of two distinguished US Regulators.
We arranged for, and attended, meetings with Special Advisers at No. 10
Downing Street, the Minister of Energy and senior civil servants, Callum
McCarthy, DG OFGEM, OFTEL and the Commons Select Committee. We discussed
the comparisons between the Californian power situation and the UK and the
approaches to telecom regulation in the US and the UK. We concluded that
the market approach to energy and telecoms was not delivering to the
consumer by quite a long way.
For the future, I have it in mind that LFIG might like
to study and make recommendations on the UK Government's problems in
delivering public service improvements.